Webinar #6: Lead or Lag? Discover What Sets the Best Clinical Directors Apart
Register Now
Try our Free Google Review Manager by SPRY for Rehab Therapy clinics
Try For Free
A remarkable 98% of eligible clinicians dodged negative payment adjustments in the MIPS healthcare program according to 2018 performance data. This statistic might look good on paper, but providers still miss out on valuable points that could substantially affect their Medicare reimbursements.
The Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) assesses clinicians and adjusts their Medicare Part B payments based on performance in four key categories. Physicians could have faced negative payment adjustments of 11% or more without MACRA. The current system caps provider penalties at 9%. Providers who scored above 75 points in 2023 earned a bonus. These bonuses come directly from penalties collected from providers with lower performance. MIPS scores don't always paint an accurate picture of true clinical performance. Physicians who care for more vulnerable patients tend to receive lower scores despite delivering high-quality care.
Let's explore the hidden scoring opportunities that most providers miss in the MIPS program. Our guide will help you work the system more effectively in 2025, whether you're just starting with MIPS or you're an experienced participant looking to boost your score.
Medicare's payment system for physicians has changed with the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). This system evaluates healthcare quality and value through a well-laid-out framework. Here's how the system works in 2025.
The Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) came into existence through the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) in 2015. This program changes healthcare delivery from traditional fee-for-service to pay-for-value. MIPS combines three previous Medicare quality programs—Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS), Value-Based Modifier (VBM), and Meaningful Use (MU)—into one unified evaluation system.
MIPS reimburses Medicare providers based on their performance quality instead of service volume. This approach rewards clinicians who improve patient care quality and outcomes while optimizing costs.
MIPS reimburses Medicare providers based on their performance quality instead of service volume. This approach rewards clinicians who improve patient care quality and outcomes while optimizing costs.
Clinicians or groups receive a MIPS Composite Performance Score (CPS) rated from 0 to 100 points. The performance threshold stands at 75 points for 2025. Providers need this minimum score to avoid penalties.
The MIPS score calculation uses this formula:
This score determines whether providers get positive, neutral, or negative adjustments to their Medicare reimbursements. CMS expects about 686,645 eligible clinicians to participate in MIPS during the 2025 performance period.
MIPS performance categories for 2025 have these weights:
Special statuses, exception applications, or Alternative Payment Model participation can alter these weights. Small practices get automatic reweighting for the Promoting Interoperability category. When they don't submit PI data, Quality increases to 40% and Improvement Activities to 30%.
Medicare will apply payment adjustments from 2025 performance in 2027. These range from -9% to +9X% (X maintains budget neutrality). The highest negative adjustment for 2025 performance stays at -9%.
Healthcare providers miss out on valuable MIPS program points because they don't know about certain scoring advantages. Here are eight overlooked opportunities that could boost your MIPS score by a lot in 2025.
Special status designations automatically exempt clinicians from reporting Promoting Interoperability data. These include ambulatory surgical center (ASC)-based, hospital-based, non-patient facing, and small practices. Starting in 2025, clinical social workers will no longer qualify for automatic reweighting. When PI is reweighted to 0%, the 25% weight shifts to other categories, typically increasing Quality to 55%.
CMS automatically calculates and scores administrative claims measures without requiring submission. These include measures like Hospital-Wide Readmission Rate and Risk-Standardized Hospital Admission Rates for patients with multiple chronic conditions. Beginning in 2025, CMS will apply a complex organization adjustment for APM Entities and virtual groups reporting eCQMs, adding one measure achievement point for each submitted eCQM.
Individual clinicians, groups, and APM Entities can earn up to 10 additional percentage points based on improvement in the quality performance category from the previous year. Small practices automatically receive 6 bonus points in the quality category when submitting at least one measure.
Beginning in 2025, improvement activities will no longer be weighted. Most clinicians must attest to 2 activities, whereas those with special status (small practice, rural, non-patient facing, HPSA) need only 1 activity for full credit. Each activity requires a minimum 90-day performance period.
MIPS Value Pathways (MVPs) allow subgroup reporting, which isn't available in traditional MIPS. This particularly benefits multispecialty groups who want to report measures relevant to specific specialties. Although voluntary through 2025, subgroup reporting becomes mandatory for multispecialty groups in 2026.
APM Entities aren't scored in the cost performance category when reporting via traditional MIPS, APP, or MVPs. Instead, the cost category is reweighted to 0% if the APM Entity reports quality and improvement activity data.
Clinicians who don't meet all three low-volume threshold criteria can still opt-in to MIPS. Those opting in become eligible for payment adjustments and bonuses, potentially beneficial for those previously successful under PQRS.
Clinicians can claim exclusions from specific PI measures under certain conditions. For example, clinicians can be excluded from Electronic Case Reporting if they don't treat reportable diseases or operate in jurisdictions without public health agencies capable of receiving electronic case reports.
Participation model selection directly impacts final MIPS composite scores. Each model presents distinct advantages and limitations that affect scoring potential and administrative requirements.
Individual reporting: Complete control over MIPS score calculation, particularly beneficial when individual performance exceeds group averages. This approach lacks data aggregation advantages available through group participation.
Group reporting: Performance aggregation across all clinicians under the same Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN). Stronger performers can balance weaker ones when performance varies among clinicians. The entire group receives identical final scores, potentially penalizing high performers.
Virtual group participation: Solo practitioners and small groups (10 or fewer clinicians) can combine resources across different TINs. Virtual groups must submit formal election requests between October 1 and December 31, 2024, for the 2025 performance year. This model requires additional administrative steps for formation.
Subgroup reporting criteria: Available exclusively under MIPS Value Pathways (MVPs) for multispecialty practices. Mandatory for multispecialty groups in 2026, though voluntary through 2025.
Registration requirements: The TIN must exceed low-volume thresholds at group level. Registration requires providing participating clinician lists, plain language names, and subgroup composition descriptions. Clinicians can participate in only one subgroup per practice.
Reporting burden reduction: APP features predetermined measure sets across three performance categories. Accountable Care Organizations participating in Medicare Shared Savings Program must report through APP, while other MIPS APM participants may choose this option.
Automatic credit benefits: APM Entities automatically receive full credit in the Improvement Activities category. This streamlined approach creates stable reporting requirements and reduces administrative complexity.
MIPS performance tracking requires specific tools and resources to identify scoring opportunities and avoid common pitfalls. CMS provides several official resources designed to help clinicians optimize their composite scores.
The QPP Participation Status Lookup Tool functions as the primary verification resource for MIPS eligibility. Clinicians enter their 10-digit National Provider Identifier (NPI) to verify eligibility status. The tool identifies special status qualifications including Small Practice, Non-Patient Facing, Rural, or HPSA designation.
Tool capabilities:
Multiple clinician eligibility checks require signed-in access through the QPP portal. Preliminary eligibility checks support participation planning. Final eligibility status becomes available once CMS updates the tool.
CMS Feedback Reports provide detailed breakdowns of previous MIPS performance, including Cost category analysis unavailable through other sources. Reports typically become available in July for the prior performance year.
Report analysis approach: Past performance analysis represents the most effective method for identifying improvement opportunities. Download your most recent CMS Feedback Report to understand successful strategies and areas requiring enhancement—including data capture processes, workflows, and EHR vendor requirements.
Access requirements: CMS HARP account provides QPP Portal login access. The Explore Measures tool allows searching, browsing, or filtering available measures, adding relevant ones to your list, and downloading collections for reference.
Support resources: QPP Service Center operates Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. ET at 1-866-288-8292 or via email at QPP@cms.hhs.gov.
Understanding MIPS scoring opportunities can significantly impact your Medicare reimbursements, with strategic participation potentially turning penalties into bonuses worth thousands of dollars annually.
• Claim automatic reweighting benefits - Special status designations (small practice, rural, hospital-based) can shift 25% PI weight to Quality category for easier scoring
• Leverage administrative claims measures - CMS automatically calculates certain quality measures without submission, providing "free" points toward your composite score
• Choose optimal participation models - Virtual groups help solo practitioners pool resources, while subgroup reporting under MVPs benefits multispecialty practices
• Maximize improvement bonuses - Quality category offers up to 10 additional points for year-over-year improvement, with small practices getting automatic 6-point bonuses
• Use CMS tools strategically - QPP Participation Status Lookup Tool and Feedback Reports provide essential data for planning and identifying scoring opportunities
The key to MIPS success lies not just in meeting requirements, but in strategically leveraging these often-overlooked opportunities to maximize your composite score and secure positive payment adjustments.
Q1. What is the MIPS performance threshold for 2025? The MIPS performance threshold for 2025 is set at 75 points. Clinicians or groups must achieve at least this score to avoid penalties on their Medicare reimbursements.
Q2. Is participation in MIPS mandatory for all healthcare providers? Not all providers are required to participate in MIPS. Qualifying APM Participants (QPs) are exempt. However, clinicians who don't achieve QP status and are considered MIPS-eligible must participate. Partial QPs only need to participate if they or their APM Entity elect to do so.
Q3. What are the four performance categories that make up the MIPS composite score? The MIPS composite score is calculated based on performance in four categories: Quality (30%), Cost (30%), Promoting Interoperability (25%), and Improvement Activities (15%).
Q4. How can providers improve their chances of receiving a positive payment adjustment in MIPS? Providers can improve their chances by leveraging overlooked scoring opportunities such as claiming automatic reweighting due to special status, using administrative claims-based quality measures, earning improvement bonuses, and choosing optimal participation models like subgroup reporting under MVPs.
Q5. What tools are available to help clinicians track and improve their MIPS scores? CMS provides several tools to help clinicians, including the QPP Participation Status Lookup Tool for checking eligibility and special statuses, and Feedback Reports that offer detailed breakdowns of previous MIPS performance. These resources can be accessed through the QPP portal.
.avif)
