NFL power rankings experts typically focus on wins and losses, but the real difference-maker operates quietly in training rooms throughout the league.
Player availability means everything - not just ability. The 2025 NFL power rankings show teams with better medical staffs, rehabilitation protocols, and strength programs consistently outperform teams plagued by injuries. The Baltimore Ravens, the healthiest team last season, showed impressive stats with a 78.6% chance to make the playoffs and 10.4 projected wins. The Philadelphia Eagles used their strong run game and excellent medical staff to achieve a 76.1% playoff probability. Both teams now lead the current power rankings with +700 odds.
Talent alone doesn't separate the NFL's best teams from others. The Eagles' offensive line helped Saquon Barkley stay healthy enough to rush for 2,000 yards last season. The Ravens managed to keep Lamar Jackson's explosive dual-threat capability intact, which led the NFL in both yards per pass attempt (8.8) and yards per carry (6.6).
This definitive 2025 NFL power rankings analysis focuses purely on physical dominance. Teams are measured by their injury prevention, rehabilitation efficiency, and performance staff integration. NFL training room professionals already understand these rankings show what truly counts - converting rehabilitation into actual game time performance.
Physical dominance isn’t just measured in stats, it’s built long before kickoff. To understand what separates the healthiest teams in our rankings from the rest, we asked performance experts for their perspective on what truly drives availability and resilience.
Sports Physical Therapist & Owner at Rehabletics
CEO - Engineering Sports Performance LLC
MPT, DPT, Owner at The Athlete Lab
CEO of @sweatofffitness & @o.k.training.
Rank | Team | 2024 AGL Rank | Key Medical Leadership | Notable Strengths | Key Challenges/Setbacks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Philadelphia Eagles | 2nd | Tom Hunkele (VP Sports Medicine) | 93% of players say trainers meet needs; 89% satisfied with PT | Training facilities rank 22nd in NFLPA report |
2 | Chicago Bears | 3rd | Andre Tucker (Sr. Director Sports Medicine) | Regular health performance meetings; well-coordinated care | Limited past data on new S&C team |
3 | Baltimore Ravens | 1st | Adrian Dixon (Head AT) | Top AGL in 2024; modern recovery facilities | Poor F-minus rating in 2023 NFLPA survey |
4 | Jacksonville Jaguars | 9th | Jeff Ferguson (Director AT) | Full hot/cold tub availability; training room ranks 7th | Family care rated F (31st place) |
5 | Atlanta Falcons | 4th | Jake Pfeil (Director Sports Medicine) | Best weight room equipment; strength coaches rank 5th | More PT staff needed |
6 | Kansas City Chiefs | 14th | Rick Burkholder (VP Sports Medicine) | Staff with 26 years experience; strong injury protocols | Facilities near bottom at 31st |
7 | Minnesota Vikings | 10th | Tyler Williams (VP Player Health) | 94% get individual treatment; training staff ranks 2nd | No specific issues noted |
8 | Denver Broncos | 6th | Beau Lowery (VP Player Health) | Lost only 95 games in 2024 | Past performance data lacking |
9 | Washington Commanders | 5th | Al Bellamy (Head AT) | Well-structured organization; better NFLPA rankings | Training area ranks low at 29th |
10 | Green Bay Packers | 7th | Bryan Engel (VP Player Health) | Named 2024's best NFL Athletic Training Staff | Must improve from 24th place in 2023 |
11 | Buffalo Bills | 8th | Nate Breske (Head AT) | Known worldwide for emergency response | Only 75% have enough full-time trainers |
12 | Pittsburgh Steelers | 18th | Dr. James Bradley (Head Team Physician) | Leaders in concussion assessment | Average performance overall |
13 | Cincinnati Bengals | 15th | Matt Summers (Director Sports Medicine) | 96% receive individual treatment | NFLPA ranks facilities 24th |
14 | Seattle Seahawks | 16th | David Stricklin (Head AT) | Uses GPS tracking and monitoring | Recent draft picks face injury issues |
15 | Tennessee Titans | 12th | Zac Woodfin (Director Sports Performance) | 90% have custom training plans | PT staff shortage affects 25% |
16 | Dallas Cowboys | 19th | Jim Maurer (Head AT) | Experienced staff; proven rehab methods | Off-site recovery creates communication gaps |
17 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 17th | Bobby Slater (VP Sports Medicine) | Strength coaches rank 6th with A grade | Ongoing facility plumbing issues |
18 | New York Giants | 13th | Ronnie Barnes (SVP Medical Services) | Smooth clinic and weight room flow | Key players continue to face injuries |
19 | LA Chargers | 11th | Salvador Lopez (Head AT), Marco Zucconi (Dir. Player Health) | Moved up from #22 to #11 in AGL; 4,000 sq-ft training room with hydrotherapy pool | Shows promise but remains vulnerable |
20 | LA Rams | 23rd | Reggie Scott (SVP Sports Medicine), Byron Cunningham (Dir. Sports Medicine) | Fell from top spot in 2023 to 23rd in 2024; Currently using temporary facilities | Health metrics show high variability |
21 | NY Jets | 20th | David Zuffelato (Head AT), Erik Korem (Dir. Player Performance) | Climbed from 27th to 20th in AGL; NFLPA report highlights worn, stained facilities | Preparedness falls below league standards |
22 | Indianapolis | 22nd | Erin Barill (Dir. Sports Medicine), Kyle Davis (Head AT) | Stays in bottom half regularly; Added dedicated rehabilitation roles | Has framework but needs better results |
23 | Miami | 28th | Dave Puloka (Dir. Player Performance) | Dropped from 21st to 28th in AGL; Uses Kitman Labs 3D video technology | Talented staff faces ongoing challenges |
24 | Houston | 21st | Roland Ramirez (Dir. Sports Medicine), Pete Ruby (Dir. Rehabilitation) | Rose from 32nd to 21st in AGL; Leads blood flow restriction training | Shows progress despite poor track record |
25 | Detroit | 25th | Todd Bastin (Medical Operations) | Ranks in bottom 4 for AGL in 2024; Runs three-hour injury clinic every Monday | Defense faces severe health challenges |
26 | New Orleans | 29th | Ted Rath (Dir. Sports Performance) | Plummeted from 5th to 29th in 2024; $12M facility upgrades in progress | Health metrics show sharp decline |
27 | New England | 24th | Jim Whalen (VP Sports Medicine), Joe Van Allen (Dir. Rehabilitation) | Poor AGL performance two years straight; Plans announced for $50M facility upgrade | Ongoing player availability problems |
28 | Las Vegas | 31st | Chris Cortez (Head AT) | Tumbled from 2nd to 31st in AGL; Features Gatorade Fuel Bar for nutrition | Health metrics reversed dramatically |
29 | Cleveland | 27th | Pat Rock (Head AT), Ryan Curtis (Dir. Health Innovation) | Players miss many games; Facilities show wear and stains | Poor results match subpar facilities |
30 | Arizona | 26th | Drew Krueger (Head AT), Evan Marcus (Head S&C) | Stays in bottom tier two years running; Ranks at bottom of NFLPA facility grades | Health metrics remain consistently low |
31 | Carolina | 30th | Denny Kellington (VP Player Health) | Ranks among bottom 3 in AGL; NFL's lowest-rated facilities | Needs complete organizational overhaul |
32 | SF 49ers | 32nd | Dustin Little (Head Sports Medicine) | Dropped to worst AGL after being top-4 in 2023; Practice now runs under 90 minutes | Unprecedented injury-plagued season |
Physical dominance sets successful NFL teams apart, as our detailed power rankings show. Our analysis reveals how strong medical systems directly affect performance on the field. The Philadelphia Eagles, Chicago Bears, and Baltimore Ravens earned their top three spots by investing in medical, rehabilitation, and strength programs that keep players ready to play.
Without doubt, the most physically dominant teams share common traits. They manage to keep excellent communication between their medical staff and strength coaches. This creates a smooth path from injury to rehabilitation and back to practice. These teams utilize data to track player workloads and recovery. They also follow clear return-to-play protocols that put long-term health before quick comebacks.
The Eagles' success shows how trust-based recovery paths lead to championship performance. Their "healthy → dip → healthy again" pattern proves how well-designed medical systems build resilience. The Ravens also made huge strides under Adrian Dixon, which shows how focusing on medical excellence can quickly transform a team's injury record.
Surprisingly, better facilities don't always mean fewer injuries. The Chiefs rank sixth despite having basic facilities, while some teams with cutting-edge complexes still struggle. This difference shows that experienced medical professionals making good decisions matter more than having the latest equipment.
A clear pattern shows up in these rankings: teams with position-specific training programs for "bigs," "mids," and "skills" do better than those using the same approach for everyone. On top of that, teams using advanced monitoring tech keep their players healthier throughout the NFL season.
Playoff spots often depend more on keeping players healthy than pure talent. The Jaguars and Falcons use excellent medical systems to keep their stars playing, while struggling teams face ongoing soft-tissue injuries and slow recovery times.
As NFL plays get more complex and athletic demands grow, these physical dominance rankings will better predict success. Even the smartest offensive system fails without healthy players to run it. Teams must invest in detailed programs that blend medical care, rehabilitation expertise, and strength training to keep players ready for important games.
The proof is clear - championships come from more than draft picks and free agency. Elite medical care and scientific strength programs keep players healthy when it counts most.
Our power rankings system analyzes team health metrics from several angles. The complexity of injury data requires someexplanation.
The statistics for AGL, games/points lost,and practice availability come from public sources and team announcements.These numbers serve as estimates rather than exact measurements. Injuries vary based on many factors that no one can control.
We did not access or use any protected health information in this analysis. The rankings follow clear criteria: 70%comes from availability impact, 20% from three-year trend stability, and 10%from program indicators like return-to-play protocols and team communication.
Physical dominance in the NFL isn't just about talent—it's about keeping that talent healthy and available when it matters most.
• Philadelphia Eagles lead through trust-based rehabilitation: Their medical staff prioritizes long-term player health over short-term availability, creating individualized care pathways that players fully embrace.
• Injury prevention beats talent acquisition: Teams like Baltimore Ravens (best AGL in 2024) and Chicago Bears (3rd-fewest games lost) prove that superior medical infrastructure consistently outperforms raw talent.
• Integrated medical systems drive championship success: Elite teams seamlessly connect medical staff, rehabilitation specialists, and strength coaches rather than operating in silos.
• Data-driven monitoring prevents injuries before they happen: Teams using GPS tracking, workload assessment, and position-specific training programs maintain healthier rosters throughout brutal NFL seasons.
• Facility quality doesn't guarantee health: Kansas City ranks 6th despite poor facilities (31st league-wide), while teams with state-of-the-art complexes sometimes struggle with availability—experienced medical professionals matter more than equipment.
The most successful NFL teams understand that availability isn't just ability—it's everything. Championship contenders consistently invest in comprehensive medical infrastructures that maximize player health, proving that the path to playoff success runs through training rooms, not just draft rooms.
While it's difficult to predict with certainty, teams like the Philadelphia Eagles, Chicago Bears, and Baltimore Ravens are likely to field top defenses in 2025 based on their current physical dominance rankings and injury prevention strategies.
NFL teams use a combination of advanced medical staff, rehabilitation protocols, strength and conditioning programs, and data-driven monitoring to keep players healthy. Top teams like the Eagles and Ravens have integrated systems connecting medical care, rehab, and strength training.
Key factors include the quality of medical and performance staff, effectiveness of rehab and return-to-play protocols, integration of strength and conditioning programs, and overall investment in player health facilities and technology.
Injury prevention is crucial for NFL success. Teams with superior medical infrastructure and lower Adjusted Games Lost (AGL) consistently outperform teams struggling with player availability, often making the difference between playoff contenders and also-rans.
Leading NFL teams are implementing data-driven methodologies like GPS tracking during practices, personalized training plans, advanced recovery technologies (e.g., cryotherapy), and position-specific conditioning programs to optimize player health and performance.
Teams are ranked based on factors like Adjusted Games Lost(AGL), injury trends, medical staff quality, rehabilitation protocols, and strength and conditioning programs. The rankings consider a team's three-year performance pattern in these areas.
The Houston Texans made a remarkable leap, jumping from32nd (last place) in 2023 to 21st in AGL ranking for 2024. This significant improvement showcases their efforts in enhancing player health and availability.
Team facilities play a crucial role. Forexample, the Arizona Cardinals ranked last in the NFLPA facility grades,contributing to their low physical dominance ranking. Conversely, teams with state-of-the-art facilities often perform better in these rankings.
Most NFL teams followindividualized approaches for player rehabilitation, avoiding set timeframes.They typically adhere to the NFL's standardized protocols, such as the five-step concussion protocol, while considering each player's unique medical history and risk factors.
Teams often struggle with maintaining consistent player availability due to injuries. Facility limitations, staff turnover, and adapting to new health and performance strategies can also pose challenges. Even top-performing teams can experience dramatic swings in health metrics from year to year.