If you run a physical therapy, occupational therapy, or speech-language pathology clinic, you are already familiar with the relentless pressure on Medicare reimbursement. Rates tighten. Administrative burden grows. And every dollar of revenue has to work harder than the year before.

What many clinic owners and PT directors still underestimate is that the Merit-based Incentive Payment System—MIPS—is no longer a peripheral compliance checkbox. It is now a direct lever on your Medicare revenue. Whether you receive a bonus, a penalty, or nothing at all two years from now depends on decisions you are making inside your practice today.

The shift to value-based care in Medicare is not a future trend. It is the operating reality. CMS is actively moving away from pure fee-for-service reimbursement and toward a model that rewards documented outcomes, care coordination, and data-driven practice management. For rehab therapy clinics—where margins are thin, Medicare patient volume is high, and documentation demands are already intense—understanding and strategically navigating MIPS is not optional. It is a financial survival skill.

This guide was written specifically for outpatient therapy clinic owners, practice administrators, and PT directors who need more than a generic Medicare overview. We cover MIPS for physical therapists end-to-end: what it is, who it applies to, how each scoring category works for therapy clinics, how it hits your revenue, what mistakes are quietly costing clinics money, and what a smarter approach looks like going into 2026.

What Is MIPS? Therapy-Specific Introduction

MIPS—the Merit-based Incentive Payment System—is the primary quality reporting and payment adjustment program under CMS's Quality Payment Program (QPP), established through the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) in 2015. It replaced several older reporting programs including PQRS, the Value Modifier, and Meaningful Use.

At its core, MIPS evaluates how clinicians deliver care across four performance categories: Quality, Cost, Improvement Activities, and Promoting Interoperability. Based on your composite score, CMS adjusts your Medicare Part B payments upward (bonus) or downward (penalty) two years after the performance year.

Most general explanations of MIPS are written with physicians in mind. But since 2019, physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech-language pathologists have been eligible MIPS clinicians under CMS—which means the same framework now applies to rehab therapy practices, with some important nuances.

For physical therapists specifically, MIPS is not simply a compliance task handed to your biller. It touches clinical documentation, outcome measurement, coding accuracy, care coordination workflows, and your EMR's ability to capture and surface performance data. Understanding how these pieces connect is the difference between a clinic that benefits from MIPS and one that quietly absorbs a penalty every two years without understanding why.

How MIPS Applies to Physical Therapists

Physical therapists became eligible MIPS clinicians beginning with the 2019 performance year. OTs and SLPs were included in the same expansion. This means PTs billing under Medicare Part B are now subject to the same performance evaluation and payment adjustment structure that has applied to physicians for years.

For rehab therapy, MIPS requirements translate into a specific set of obligations: selecting and reporting on quality measures relevant to your patient population, allowing CMS to evaluate your cost performance through claims data, completing improvement activities aligned with your care model, and addressing the Promoting Interoperability category (or qualifying for a reweight).

Reporting options for therapy clinics include claims-based submission, Qualified Registries, Qualified Clinical Data Registries (QCDRs), and direct EHR submission. Group practices can report collectively, which often simplifies the process for multi-provider clinics. Choosing the right submission mechanism for your practice size and EMR capabilities is one of the first strategic decisions in building an effective MIPS program.

Who Must Participate in MIPS? (Eligibility Overview)

Not every physical therapist or therapy clinic is required to participate in MIPS. CMS determines eligibility based on annual claims data, and clinics that fall below certain thresholds are excluded from the program. Understanding where your clinic stands is the starting point for any MIPS strategy.

The Low-Volume Threshold (Simplified)

CMS uses a low-volume threshold to exclude very small or low-Medicare-volume practices from mandatory MIPS participation. For the 2026 performance year, a clinician or group is excluded from MIPS if they fall at or below any one of the following criteria:

• $90,000 or less in Medicare Part B allowed charges during the determination period
• 200 or fewer Medicare Part B patients served
• 200 or fewer covered professional services provided under Medicare Part B

If your clinic exceeds all three thresholds, you are a MIPS-eligible clinician and are subject to the program's reporting requirements and payment adjustments. Note that CMS typically uses a 12-month rolling claims window to determine eligibility, so changes in your Medicare volume can shift your status year to year.

Individual vs. Group Reporting for Physical Therapy Clinics

Phhysical therapy clinics can participate in MIPS either as individual clinicians or as a group practice. Individual reporting evaluates each eligible clinician's performance separately, which works well for solo practitioners or small clinics where provider-level data is meaningful. Group reporting consolidates the performance of all MIPS-eligible clinicians under the same Tax Identification Number (TIN), which can smooth out performance variability across a multi-therapist practice and often reduces administrative burden.

For outpatient rehab practices with multiple PTs, OTs, or SLPs, group reporting is generally the more practical approach—particularly because it enables the group to pool quality measure data and improvement activities across all eligible providers. However, it also means that weaker performers within the group affect the group's overall score, so internal performance monitoring remains important.

What Happens If You Ignore MIPS?

This is where the stakes become concrete. If a MIPS-eligible physical therapy clinic fails to submit any performance data during a performance year, CMS automatically assigns the maximum negative payment adjustment. For 2026, that penalty is applied to all Medicare Part B reimbursements two years later.

Historically, the maximum negative adjustment has moved toward -9%, though CMS recalibrates the adjustment range annually based on budget-neutral distribution. The key point: non-reporting is not neutral. It is the worst possible MIPS outcome, equivalent to voluntarily leaving a percentage of your Medicare revenue on the table every year without any clinical benefit in return.

MIPS Categories Explained for Rehab Therapy Clinics

MIPS is evaluated across four performance categories. For physical therapists and other rehab therapy clinicians, understanding how each category is weighted and what it measures in practice is essential for effective MIPS reporting for PT clinics and meeting rehab MIPS requirements without unnecessary administrative burden.

1. Quality (Most Impactful for PTs)

Quality is the most heavily weighted MIPS category for most therapy clinics and the one where deliberate strategy has the greatest impact on your final score. Clinicians typically report on six quality measures—or the maximum available if fewer than six apply to their specialty—including at least one outcome measure.

For physical therapists, relevant quality measures often include:

• Functional outcome reporting — documenting standardized functional status assessments (such as FOTO, OPTIMAL, or PROMIS tools) at intake and discharge
• Falls risk assessment — screening and documenting fall risk for applicable patient populations, particularly older adults in outpatient PT
• Plan of care documentation — confirming that goals, interventions, and expected outcomes are clearly documented and updated
• Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) — capturing patient-reported data on pain, function, and quality of life at defined intervals
• Adherence and care coordination — documenting communication with referring physicians and primary care providers

The critical mistake many PT clinics make in this category is selecting measures based on ease of data collection rather than performance potential. A measure you can report on consistently with high performance rates is worth far more than a measure that is easy to code but yields mediocre benchmark comparison scores. Quality measure selection should be an annual strategic decision, not a default carry-forward.

2. Cost (How CMS Calculates It for Therapists)

The Cost category is calculated entirely by CMS using Medicare claims data—you do not submit anything for this category. CMS evaluates cost performance using episode-based cost measures and the Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) metric, assessing how efficiently care is delivered relative to peers treating similar patient populations.

For therapy clinics, cost performance is closely linked to coding accuracy. CPT code selection, billing modifier usage, and treatment frequency documentation all affect how CMS interprets the cost of care episodes attributed to your practice. Clinics with inconsistent or inaccurate coding often find their cost category score dragging down their overall MIPS composite even when their quality scores are strong.

While CMS has historically weighted Cost lower for therapy clinicians than for physicians, this category's influence on the final score is growing. Monitoring your billing patterns and ensuring that documentation supports the medical necessity and efficiency of your care delivery is the most effective lever for cost performance improvement.

3. Improvement Activities

The Improvement Activities (IA) category rewards clinicians for engaging in specific practice-level initiatives that improve care delivery, care coordination, patient safety, and population health. Activities are worth either medium or high credit, and completing a defined number of activities earns full credit for the category.

For outpatient rehab therapy practices, relevant improvement activities include:

• Care coordination — establishing or expanding formal care coordination protocols with referring physicians, hospitals, or community health organizations
• Telehealth expansion — using telehealth to increase access to care, particularly for patients with mobility limitations or in underserved areas
• Population health management — implementing evidence-based screening programs (e.g., fall prevention, chronic pain management) for relevant patient populations
• Beneficiary engagement — using shared decision-making tools, patient portals, or outcome tracking systems to actively involve patients in their care plans
• Opioid stewardship — documenting non-opioid pain management approaches, which is highly relevant for PT practices treating musculoskeletal conditions

Most therapy clinics can achieve full credit in this category with two to four well-chosen, well-documented activities that align with work they are already doing. The key is ensuring those activities are formally documented and mapped to CMS's approved IA list.

4. Promoting Interoperability (Why It's Often Reweighted for PTs)

Promoting Interoperability (PI) measures clinicians' use of Certified Electronic Health Record Technology (CEHRT) to exchange health information, support patient access, and participate in electronic data reporting. This category was originally designed around the infrastructure and workflows of physician practices using certified EHRs tied to hospital and health system data ecosystems.

For physical therapists and other therapy clinicians, PI is frequently reweighted or exempted by CMS. Many outpatient rehab practices do not use CEHRT systems that support the specific electronic health information exchange functions PI measures require—particularly bi-directional exchange through certified health information networks. CMS recognizes this distinction and typically allows therapy clinicians to apply for a PI hardship exemption, with the PI category weight redistributed to Quality.

If your clinic does use a CEHRT-certified system, you may be able to report PI measures and earn credit. But for most outpatient PT clinics, the practical path is confirming your exemption status annually and ensuring the reweighted Quality category reflects the strongest possible performance.

How MIPS Impacts Physical Therapy Clinic Revenue

The financial mechanics of MIPS are straightforward in concept but frequently misunderstood in practice. Your performance in a given year does not affect your reimbursement until two years later—a lag that makes it easy to underestimate the consequences of poor performance today and the rewards of strong performance tomorrow.

Bonus vs. Penalty Reality for Physical Therapy Clinics

The actual financial impact of MIPS on a physical therapy clinic depends on three factors: your Medicare revenue volume, your composite MIPS score, and the overall performance distribution across all eligible clinicians in that year. CMS sets the performance threshold (the minimum score to avoid a penalty) annually, typically in the 75-point range in recent years.

Clinics that score above the threshold receive a positive adjustment. Those that exceed the exceptional performance threshold—historically around 85 points—receive an additional bonus. The positive adjustments are budget-neutral, meaning they are funded by the penalties collected from low performers. In practice, this means that strong performers in competitive performance years may receive smaller bonuses than expected, while the floor penalty remains fixed.

For an outpatient PT clinic with $500,000 in annual Medicare Part B revenue, a -9% penalty equals $45,000 in lost reimbursement over a payment year. A +4% bonus equals $20,000 in additional revenue. The difference between those two scenarios—roughly $65,000—is entirely determined by how well your clinic manages MIPS performance over a 12-month period.

Why Many Clinics Lose Money Without Realizing It

The two-year lag between performance and payment adjustment creates a blind spot that catches many therapy clinics off guard. A clinic that underperforms in 2025 will not see the financial consequence until 2027—by which point the connection between current-year clinical decisions and the payment reduction is easy to miss.

This lag also means that clinics who invest in MIPS improvement today will not see the financial return for two years, creating a temptation to deprioritize reporting in favor of immediate operational concerns. The clinics that consistently outperform on MIPS are the ones that treat it as a year-round operational function rather than an annual reporting event—because by the time December arrives, most of the performance data that determines your score has already been generated.

Common MIPS Mistakes Physical Therapy Clinics Make

After working with outpatient rehab practices across the country, the same patterns of underperformance emerge repeatedly. These are not exotic errors—they are predictable, preventable, and expensive.

Selecting low-performance quality measures. Many clinics choose measures based on what is easiest to collect rather than what will yield the strongest benchmark comparison scores. A measure where your clinic performs at the 30th percentile of peers is damaging to your quality score even if the data was easy to document. Annual measure selection should be driven by performance benchmarking data, not habit.

Ignoring the cost category. Because cost is calculated by CMS and requires no submission, it gets little attention inside therapy clinics. But coding inconsistencies, treatment utilization patterns, and documentation gaps directly affect how CMS attributes episode costs to your practice. Clinics that never review their cost attribution data are flying blind in a category that can meaningfully affect their composite score.

Poor documentation structure. MIPS quality measure performance is built on clinical documentation. Outcome measures that are collected but not structured correctly in the medical record do not count for reporting purposes. Documentation that does not clearly support plan of care goals, functional baselines, or discharge status creates gaps that reduce measure performance rates—and ultimately reduce scores.

Waiting until submission time. Reviewing MIPS performance in January for a performance year that ended December 31 is too late to correct anything. Measure denominator exclusions, missing outcome data, and incomplete improvement activity documentation are year-round issues that require year-round monitoring to address before they become permanent score deficits.

Using EMRs without MIPS reporting visibility. Many outpatient therapy EMR platforms were not designed with MIPS quality capture in mind. If your system cannot tell you which patients have met measure criteria, which are missing required data elements, and what your current performance rate is for each measure in real time, you are managing MIPS blind—and the year-end data submission will reflect that.

How Technology Simplifies MIPS Reporting for PT Clinics

The operational challenge of MIPS is not understanding what the program requires. It is consistently capturing, organizing, and reporting performance data across hundreds of patient encounters over a 12-month period. Technology is the variable that separates clinics that find MIPS manageable from those that find it overwhelming.

Manual Tracking vs. Structured Documentation

Some clinics still manage MIPS tracking through spreadsheets, manual chart audits, and end-of-year data pulls from their billing system. This approach is not only time-consuming—it is unreliable. Manual tracking misses data that was documented but not structured correctly, fails to catch missing outcome measures in real time, and creates a last-minute scramble that consistently underperforms relative to clinics using structured documentation workflows.

Structured documentation means that the clinical data your therapists are already capturing—functional outcomes, care coordination notes, fall risk screenings, plan of care updates—is organized within your EMR in a way that maps directly to MIPS quality measures and improvement activities. When documentation is structured, performance data is not something you compile at year-end; it is something your system is calculating continuously.

Real-Time Outcome Tracking and Quality Capture

One of the highest-value capabilities for MIPS-focused physical therapy clinics is real-time visibility into outcome measure completion rates and quality measure performance. When a therapist can see at the point of care that a patient is missing a required outcome assessment, that gap can be addressed before the patient discharges—rather than discovered months later during a data audit when correction is no longer possible.

Real-time quality capture is also critical for denominator management. Many MIPS measures apply to specific patient populations based on diagnosis, age, visit count, or clinical criteria. Systems that automatically identify eligible patients for each measure—and flag when required data elements are missing—dramatically reduce measure exclusion errors and improve overall performance rates.

Performance Dashboards vs. End-of-Year Panic

A MIPS performance dashboard gives clinic administrators and PT directors a continuous view of their composite score trajectory, measure-level performance rates, and improvement activity completion status. This visibility transforms MIPS from an annual compliance event into a manageable operational metric—one that can be monitored, adjusted, and optimized throughout the performance year rather than assessed after all outcomes are locked.

Clinics that operate with this kind of visibility tend to make better mid-year decisions: switching underperforming quality measures before the performance rate is set, adding improvement activities before the documentation deadline, or identifying specific providers whose performance is pulling the group score downward in time to provide coaching or workflow support.

What to Look for in MIPS Reporting Software

When evaluating technology for MIPS reporting for PT clinics, the most important capabilities to assess are not feature lists—they are workflow integrations. The right MIPS reporting software should feel like a natural extension of your clinical documentation process, not a separate system your team has to populate in addition to their normal charting.

Key capabilities to evaluate include:

• Automated measure population identification — the system should identify eligible patients for each quality measure without requiring manual filtering
• Real-time performance rate tracking — a MIPS performance dashboard for PT that updates continuously based on documented encounters
• Outcome measure integration — standardized outcome tools built into the clinical workflow, not bolted on separately
• MIPS compliance workflow software — alerts, reminders, and task lists that prompt clinical staff when required data elements are missing before a patient discharges
• Submission-ready reporting — the ability to generate CMS-formatted quality data reports directly from the system, reducing manual data preparation at submission time

Key Takeaways

• MIPS is mandatory for most outpatient PT, OT, and SLP clinics billing Medicare Part B above the low-volume threshold. Non-reporting results in automatic maximum penalties.
• MIPS performance in a given year affects Medicare reimbursement two years later—meaning decisions made today create financial consequences that show up when they are hardest to trace back to their source.
• Quality is the most impactful MIPS category for therapy clinics. Selecting high-performance measures matched to your patient population is the single most effective strategy for score improvement.
• The Cost category is calculated by CMS from claims data and requires no submission—but coding accuracy and documentation quality directly affect how CMS scores your cost performance.
• Promoting Interoperability is frequently reweighted or exempted for therapy clinicians. Confirm your exemption status annually and ensure the redistributed Quality weight is maximized.
• The most common—and most expensive—MIPS mistake is treating it as an end-of-year reporting event rather than a year-round operational function.
• Technology is the lever that makes MIPS manageable. Structured documentation, real-time outcome tracking, and performance dashboards are the infrastructure that separates clinics that win under MIPS from those that consistently underperform.
• MIPS is the entry point to value-based care. Clinics investing in quality infrastructure today are building the foundation for sustainable performance as Medicare's reimbursement model continues to evolve.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do physical therapists have to report MIPS?

Physical therapists became MIPS-eligible clinicians starting in 2019. If your clinic exceeds the low-volume threshold—more than $90,000 in Medicare Part B charges, more than 200 Medicare patients served, or more than 200 covered professional services annually—you are required to participate in MIPS. Failure to report results in the maximum negative payment adjustment on your Medicare reimbursements two years later.

How do PT clinics report MIPS data?

Therapy clinics can report MIPS data through several mechanisms: claims-based submission (adding quality data codes to Medicare claims), Qualified Registries, Qualified Clinical Data Registries (QCDRs), direct EHR submission, or as a group practice under a shared TIN. The right submission method depends on your practice size, EMR capabilities, and quality measure selection. Many outpatient PT clinics work through a registry or QCDR that handles formatting and submission on their behalf.

What are the MIPS categories for physical therapists?

MIPS is evaluated across four categories: Quality (typically the most heavily weighted for PTs, based on clinical measure performance), Cost (claims-based, calculated by CMS), Improvement Activities (care coordination, telehealth, population health initiatives), and Promoting Interoperability (often reweighted or exempted for therapy clinics that do not use CEHRT systems meeting PI requirements). CMS adjusts category weights annually; Quality and Cost tend to carry the most weight for therapy clinicians.

How does MIPS affect Medicare payments for therapy clinics?

Your MIPS composite score from a given performance year determines a positive or negative adjustment to your Medicare Part B reimbursements two years later. Clinics that score above the performance threshold receive a positive adjustment. Those below it receive a penalty of up to -9%. High scorers above the exceptional performance threshold may receive an additional bonus. For a clinic with significant Medicare revenue, this adjustment can represent tens of thousands of dollars annually.

What happens if a therapy clinic does not report MIPS?

If an eligible therapy clinic fails to submit any MIPS performance data, CMS automatically applies the maximum negative payment adjustment—currently up to -9%—to all Medicare Part B reimbursements in the corresponding payment year, two years after the performance year. This is the worst possible MIPS outcome, and it is entirely avoidable even with minimal reporting. Submitting as little as one quality measure can reduce or eliminate the penalty.

Can a physical therapy clinic be exempt from MIPS?

Yes. Clinics below the low-volume threshold (under $90,000 in Part B charges, fewer than 200 Medicare patients, or fewer than 200 covered professional services) are excluded. Clinics in their first year of Medicare Part B billing are also exempt. Additionally, practices that qualify as Advanced APM participants may be excluded from MIPS. CMS determines eligibility annually, so your status can change as your Medicare volume grows or contracts.

What quality measures should physical therapists report for MIPS?

Physical therapists should prioritize quality measures that reflect actual clinical workflows and where consistent high performance is achievable. Strong candidates include functional outcome reporting at intake and discharge, falls risk screening and follow-up, plan of care documentation completeness, and patient-reported outcome measures. Measure selection should be informed by CMS benchmark data—choosing measures where your clinic performs above the 60th percentile of peers is far more valuable than defaulting to measures that are easy to collect but yield weak comparative performance.

‍