Most physical therapy clinic owners approach MIPS quality measure selection the same way they choose a parking spot — they grab the first one that looks available. The result is a score that reflects the convenience of that decision rather than the actual quality of care their clinic delivers.

Quality is not just one category among four in MIPS. For most outpatient PT and OT clinics, it carries the heaviest scoring weight and represents the single greatest opportunity to either build toward the 75-point performance threshold or fall short of it entirely. Choosing the wrong measures — or reporting the right ones poorly — can cap your maximum possible composite score before the performance year is even halfway through.

This guide is specifically for physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology clinics navigating MIPS quality measure selection for 2026. It covers how measures are weighted, how to select strategically, which measures are most relevant to rehab practice, and the documentation habits that separate clinics that consistently score above threshold from those that don't.

What Are MIPS Quality Measures?

MIPS quality measures are evidence-based performance metrics that CMS uses to evaluate the care a clinician delivers to Medicare beneficiaries. They are the reporting mechanism through which eligible clinicians demonstrate — with data — that their care meets or exceeds national standards for clinical quality.

Each measure has two components that determine how many points it contributes to your composite score. The first is your performance rate: the percentage of eligible patients for whom you met the measure criteria during the performance year. The second is the benchmark comparison: where your performance rate falls relative to other clinicians reporting the same measure nationally.

A high performance rate earns more points only when there is an established national benchmark to compare it against. Measures with no benchmark — typically new or low-volume measures — receive a flat floor score of 3 points regardless of how well the clinic performed. This is why measure selection matters far more than raw clinical performance.

Not every measure in the CMS inventory applies to physical therapy. The full MIPS measure set spans hundreds of options written for primary care, cardiology, oncology, and other specialties. PT and OT clinics must identify measures where their patient population, documentation workflows, and billing methods are compatible with the measure's denominator and numerator criteria.

How Quality Is Weighted for Physical Therapists

Under standard MIPS scoring for 2026, the Quality category accounts for 30% of the total composite score. For small practices with 15 or fewer MIPS-eligible clinicians — the majority of outpatient PT clinics — the Promoting Interoperability category is typically reweighted to zero, which redistributes those points to Quality. In this reweighting scenario, Quality can account for up to 50% of the total composite score.

This means a clinic's quality measure performance is, in most cases, the single most impactful variable in determining whether they score above or below the 75-point threshold.

CMS requires eligible clinicians to report on 6 quality measures for the full performance year. At least one of those measures must be an outcome measure — meaning it captures actual patient health status or functional change — if an applicable outcome measure exists in the specialty measure set. If no outcome measure applies to a clinician's scope of practice, a high-priority measure (such as a patient safety or care coordination measure) may be substituted.

Each measure must meet a 75% data completeness threshold, meaning at least 75% of denominator-eligible encounters during the performance year must have a valid numerator response recorded. Measures with fewer than 20 eligible cases cannot be benchmarked and receive the 3-point floor score.

How to Choose the Right MIPS Quality Measures for Rehab

The most common measure selection mistake in physical therapy is choosing measures based on what seems easiest to document rather than what will generate the most points. These are not the same thing.

Your patient population determines your denominator. If you primarily treat post-surgical orthopedic patients between 40 and 70 years old, measures that are denominator-eligible only for patients over 65 with specific chronic conditions will generate very few reportable encounters — meaning you may not reach the 20-case minimum needed for benchmarking, and you will receive only the 3-point floor.

Your documentation workflow determines your numerator capture rate. A measure may be clinically relevant to your practice but require documentation elements — a specific screening tool, a follow-up note within a defined timeframe, a structured care plan notation — that your current intake or progress note templates do not capture. Running a measure your EMR cannot support reliably is a data completeness risk.

Your submission method matters. Clinics submitting via claims have access to a subset of measures, while registry and QCDR submission opens access to a broader range. Confirming which measures are available under your intended submission method before the performance year begins prevents discovering mid-year that your selected measures cannot be reported through your chosen channel.

Benchmark availability is the most important strategic factor. Before finalizing your measure set, review the prior-year benchmark data available on qpp.cms.gov for each measure you are considering. A measure where the national median performance rate is 85% — meaning the midpoint clinician reports correctly on 85% of eligible patients — offers a clear target. A measure with no published benchmark offers only the 3-point floor regardless of your performance rate.

Top MIPS Quality Measures for Physical Therapy Clinics

The following measures are among those most frequently applicable to outpatient physical therapy practice based on patient population, documentation compatibility, and benchmark availability. Confirm current measure specifications and applicable denominator criteria on qpp.cms.gov before finalizing your 2026 measure set, as CMS updates specifications annually.

Functional Outcome Assessment (Measure #182)

What it measures: Whether a standardized functional outcome tool was used to assess the patient's functional status at the time of the initial evaluation and again at follow-up or discharge.

Who it applies to: Physical and occupational therapists treating patients with musculoskeletal, neurological, or functional conditions — which covers the vast majority of outpatient PT caseloads.

Reporting method: Registry or QCDR. Not reportable via claims.

Why it works well for rehab clinics: This measure directly reflects the core clinical workflow of physical therapy. Intake assessment and discharge reassessment with a standardized tool is standard practice. Clinics that have structured this workflow correctly are already performing the clinical action — the challenge is documentation consistency, not clinical change.

Common documentation mistake: Using a standardized tool at intake but failing to document a follow-up or discharge assessment in structured format. If the discharge score is missing or recorded in an unstructured narrative field rather than a data-capture field, the numerator is not captured, and the encounter is counted against your performance rate.

Falls Risk Screening (Measure #154 / related measures)

What it measures: Whether patients aged 65 and older were screened for fall risk using a standardized tool during the measurement period.

Who it applies to: PT clinics with Medicare populations over 65 — which is most outpatient rehab practices given Medicare's age eligibility.

Reporting method: Claims or registry.

Why it works well for rehab clinics: Falls risk is directly within PT scope of practice and is a routine part of geriatric and balance-focused care. Benchmark performance rates for this measure have historically been achievable for practices with structured intake protocols.

Common documentation mistake: Screening verbally without recording the tool used, the score, and the result. CMS requires the screening to be documented with sufficient specificity to confirm it occurred. A note that says "fall risk assessed" without identifying the tool or recording the outcome does not satisfy the numerator criteria.

Falls Plan of Care (Measure #155 / related measures)

What it measures: Whether a falls prevention intervention or plan of care was documented for patients identified as at risk for falls.

Who it applies to: Patients who screened positive for fall risk. Often paired with the Falls Risk Screening measure as a complementary reporting set.

Reporting method: Claims or registry.

Why it works well for rehab clinics: Reporting this measure alongside the screening measure demonstrates a complete care process — identification and response. Both measures together reflect a higher standard of care coordination and score as independent measures, giving clinics two reportable data points from a single structured clinical workflow.

Common documentation mistake: Documenting a falls risk screening result without linking it to a documented plan of care or intervention. The plan must be explicit, not implied by the treatment approach.

Pain Assessment and Follow-Up (Measure #131)

What it measures: Whether a patient's pain was assessed using a standardized tool and, if pain was present, whether a follow-up plan was documented.

Who it applies to: A broad patient population relevant to most outpatient rehab diagnoses involving musculoskeletal conditions, post-surgical recovery, or chronic pain.

Reporting method: Claims or registry.

Why it works well for rehab clinics: Pain assessment is embedded in virtually every PT evaluation. The clinical workflow already exists — the documentation requirement is to use a standardized scale (such as the Numeric Rating Scale) and document a follow-up plan when pain is identified. This is a measure where the denominator is large and the numerator capture rate is high for clinics with consistent intake templates.

Common documentation mistake: Recording a pain score without documenting a follow-up plan or subsequent reassessment. Both components must be present in the documentation for the numerator to be captured.

Preventive Care: Tobacco Use Screening and Cessation Intervention (Measure #226)

What it measures: Whether patients were screened for tobacco use and, if identified as users, received cessation counseling or a referral.

Who it applies to: All adult patients — a broad denominator that covers most outpatient PT populations.

Reporting method: Claims or registry.

Why it works well for rehab clinics: The denominator is large, the screening action is a single documented question, and the cessation response can be a referral rather than in-clinic counseling. For clinics that add this to their intake form, the documentation requirement is minimal relative to the number of reportable encounters it generates.

Common documentation mistake: Screening without documenting the result or failing to document a cessation referral for patients who screen positive. The referral itself does not need to be completed by the PT — it must be documented.

Depression Screening and Follow-Up (Measure #134)

What it measures: Whether adult patients were screened for depression using a standardized tool and, if positive, received a documented follow-up plan.

Who it applies to: Adult patients across a broad range of diagnoses. Particularly relevant for chronic pain populations and post-stroke or neurological rehab patients.

Reporting method: Claims or registry.

Why it works well for rehab clinics: Depression comorbidity is clinically significant in chronic pain and neurological populations that PT clinics commonly treat. The screening tool (such as the PHQ-2 or PHQ-9) is brief and can be incorporated into a standard intake workflow. Positive screens require a documented follow-up plan — typically a referral to a behavioral health provider — not in-clinic treatment.

Common documentation mistake: Administering the screening tool but recording the result in an unstructured note field rather than a structured data element. If the result is not captured in a format your registry or QCDR can extract, the encounter does not count toward your numerator.

Outcome Measures vs Process Measures in Physical Therapy

Understanding the difference between these two measure types directly affects how you build your quality reporting strategy.

A process measure evaluates whether a specific clinical action was performed — a screening was conducted, a plan was documented, a referral was made. Process measures are generally easier to perform at high rates because the numerator criterion is a documented action rather than a patient outcome. Falls risk screening and pain assessment are process measures.

An outcome measure evaluates whether the patient's health status or function actually changed as a result of care. Functional outcome assessment measures fall into this category. Outcome measures are more clinically meaningful and often score better on benchmarks because fewer clinicians track them systematically — creating a higher-performing cohort to benchmark against.

CMS requires at least one outcome measure in your six-measure set if an applicable outcome measure exists in your specialty set. For physical therapists, the Functional Outcome Assessment measure is the clearest option. Clinics that invest in structured outcome tracking — consistent use of validated tools at intake and discharge for every eligible patient — will consistently outperform those that rely on narrative documentation.

Documentation Tips to Maximize Your MIPS Quality Score

The gap between a clinic that scores 60 points on Quality and one that scores 85 is rarely a difference in the care being delivered. It is almost always a documentation discipline gap.

Use structured intake templates that embed measure-specific fields rather than relying on free-text notes. If your intake form includes a designated field for the falls risk screening tool name, score, and result, every therapist captures it consistently. If the form has a free-text "assessment" section, documentation will vary by clinician.

Standardize the assessment tools you use and name them explicitly in your documentation. CMS measure specifications often require that the tool used be identified by name. A note that says "functional status assessed" does not satisfy a numerator criterion that requires a validated functional outcome tool.

Build follow-up documentation into your workflow, not just your intake. Several measures require both an initial action and a documented follow-up — pain reassessment, falls plan of care, depression follow-up. If your progress note template does not prompt for these follow-up elements, they will be inconsistently captured.

Train your team on denominator exclusions. Many measures allow patients to be excluded from the denominator under specific clinical circumstances — patient refusal, medical contraindication, or limited life expectancy. Documenting these exclusions correctly removes cases from the denominator rather than counting them against your performance rate. Failing to document a valid exclusion turns a clinically appropriate decision into a numerator miss.

Review your data completeness monthly, not at year-end. A 75% data completeness threshold means you can afford to miss documentation on 25% of eligible encounters before the measure becomes unscorable. But missing documentation compounds — a clinic that discovers a 60% completeness rate in December has no opportunity to recover it.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many quality measures must PT clinics report?

CMS requires eligible clinicians to report on 6 quality measures for the full 2026 performance year. Reporting fewer than 6 measures results in a reduced Quality category score. All six measures must meet the 75% data completeness threshold to be benchmarkable.

Do physical therapists need an outcome measure?

‍Yes, if an applicable outcome measure exists within the specialty measure set available to the reporting clinician. For most outpatient PT clinics, the Functional Outcome Assessment measure satisfies this requirement. If no applicable outcome measure exists, a high-priority measure may be substituted without penalty.

Can PTs report quality measures via claims?

‍Yes, for a subset of measures. Claims-based reporting limits you to measures that use CPT or diagnosis codes as the numerator and denominator criteria. Several PT-relevant measures — including Functional Outcome Assessment — are not available via claims and require registry or QCDR submission. Confirm your measure set is compatible with your submission method before the performance year begins.

What happens if a measure has no benchmark?

‍Measures with no established national benchmark receive a flat score of 3 points regardless of your performance rate. This typically applies to new measures in their first year of reporting, or measures with fewer than 20 national data submissions in a prior year. Relying on multiple unbenchmarked measures can severely limit your maximum achievable Quality category score.

Can I change measures mid-year?

‍Technically yes — your final measure set is determined at submission, not at the start of the year. However, switching measures mid-year means any data collected under a measure you ultimately do not report is wasted, and you may not have sufficient denominator cases for the new measure to meet the 75% completeness threshold or the 20-case minimum for benchmarking. The practical implication is that mid-year measure changes are high-risk and should only be made if you identify a serious performance problem with a selected measure early in the year.

‍