SPRY is the stronger fit for outpatient PT, OT, and SLP practices that bill Medicare and commercial insurance, because it automates rehab-specific billing rules — the 8-Minute Rule, KX modifier thresholds, GP/GO/GN modifiers, and NCCI edits — directly inside the clinical record.

Jane App is a strong, well-reviewed scheduling and practice management platform used across a much broader range of health and wellness disciplines (physiotherapy, massage, chiropractic, counseling, naturopathy), but in the US it routes insurance billing through a third-party clearinghouse integration rather than a native, discipline-specific billing engine. Which one is right for you depends on one question: is your practice's real bottleneck scheduling and booking, or insurance claim accuracy?

Quick Verdict

‍

*Jane's pricing structure and exact current rate should be confirmed directly on jane.app before publishing; the figure above is from a third-party aggregator, not Jane's own pricing page.

What Is Jane App?

Jane App is a cloud-based practice management platform built by Jane Software, a company based in North Vancouver, Canada, founded in 2014. It's used by more than 4,000 physiotherapy practices along with massage therapists, chiropractors, counselors, naturopaths, and other health and wellness providers, spanning the US, Canada, and the UK.

Jane's core strength — and the reason it shows up consistently in "easiest to use" and "best scheduling" conversations — is the booking and calendar experience. Online booking, customizable treatment types, automated SMS and email reminders, a Physitrack integration for prescribing home exercise programs, and a clean, well-reviewed interface are the features Jane users cite most often. It's a genuinely well-built product for what it's built for.

What Jane is not built as: a Medicare- and insurance-compliance-first billing engine for a single specialty. It's intentionally horizontal — one platform serving physios, massage therapists, and mental health counselors alike — which means its billing tools are general-purpose. In the US specifically, insurance claims run through an integration with Claim.MD, a third-party clearinghouse, rather than through billing logic built natively into Jane's own database. For a solo massage therapist billing mostly self-pay clients, that's irrelevant. For a Medicare-heavy outpatient PT clinic, it's the single biggest gap in the comparison.

What Is SPRY?

SPRY is an AI-native EMR and revenue cycle management platform built specifically for outpatient physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology practices — from solo clinicians to 50+ location enterprise groups. Unlike Jane, SPRY isn't a horizontal scheduling tool with billing bolted on; it's a rehab-billing platform first, with documentation, scheduling, eligibility, claims, and payments running on one database.

The practical difference shows up in the details that actually generate denials in outpatient rehab: SPRY calculates billable units for timed CPT codes (97110, 97112, 97140) directly from the minutes documented in the note, applying the 8-Minute Rule automatically rather than leaving unit math to a biller. It tracks each Medicare patient's cumulative therapy spend against the KX modifier threshold ($2,480 for PT/SLP combined in 2026, per CMS) and applies the modifier automatically once the threshold is crossed. Discipline modifiers — GP for PT, GO for OT, GN for SLP — are structural properties of the documenting clinician, not something a biller has to remember on every claim. SPRY reports a 95%+ first-pass clean claim rate, under 7 days in A/R, and 97%+ eligibility accuracy checked 48–72 hours before each visit — published product benchmarks, not third-party audited figures.

The Category Gap

This comparison is a little different from a typical "Platform A vs Platform B" matchup, because SPRY and Jane aren't really built to solve the same problem.

Jane is a multi-discipline practice management and scheduling platform. Its billing tools work fine for a self-pay or low-insurance-volume practice, and its calendar and booking experience is genuinely one of the best-reviewed in the category — reviewers consistently praise it for exactly that. But it wasn't designed around the specific denial-generating mechanics of Medicare outpatient therapy billing: the 8-Minute Rule, the KX modifier threshold, NCCI bundling edits between timed and untimed codes, or Plan of Care recertification windows. None of that is a criticism of Jane's product — it's simply outside what a horizontal wellness-scheduling platform is built to do.

SPRY is a specialty billing platform first, with scheduling and documentation built around that core. If a clinic's primary pain point is "our booking software is clunky," Jane solves that well. If the pain point is "we're losing 8–12% of claims to modifier errors and unit miscalculations," that's a structural gap Jane's architecture wasn't built to close, and SPRY's was.

There's also a practical signal worth reading into this: Jane markets itself across chiropractic, massage therapy, mental health, and naturopathy in addition to physiotherapy, with largely the same core product across all of them. A platform built to serve that many disciplines equally well is, by definition, not going to have gone as deep on any single specialty's billing edge cases as a platform built for exactly one category. That's not a flaw in Jane's strategy — breadth is a legitimate product decision — but it does mean a PT-specific evaluator should expect PT-specific depth to be thinner than a purpose-built alternative.

Documentation and Scheduling: A Closer Look

Since scheduling is Jane's strongest category, it's worth comparing the two platforms on that ground specifically rather than only on billing.

Booking and calendar management. Jane's online booking flow is built to be patient-facing and self-service: patients pick a treatment type, see real availability, and book without staff involvement, with automated SMS and email reminders reducing no-shows. This is genuinely one of the more polished booking experiences in the wellness-software category, and it's the single most-cited strength across Jane's reviews. SPRY includes comparable online booking and automated reminders, but it isn't SPRY's headline feature the way it is Jane's — SPRY's scheduling is built to feed directly into eligibility and authorization checks (a booked appointment automatically triggers a 48–72-hour-out eligibility check), which is a meaningful difference for insurance-heavy clinics but a less visible one for booking UX alone.

Clinical documentation. This is where the platforms diverge most. Jane offers templated forms, surveys, and electronic charting, plus a Physitrack integration for prescribing home exercise programs. It's flexible enough to serve physios, massage therapists, and counselors with the same charting tools. SPRY's documentation is purpose-built for rehab: an AI scribe that generates SOAP notes in real time, auto-suggested CPT and ICD-10 codes based on the documented content, and templates that carry forward from initial evaluations into subsequent visits. The practical difference shows up in billing accuracy — because SPRY's documentation and coding are the same system, a unit count that doesn't match the treatment time documented gets flagged before the note is even signed, not after a claim comes back denied.

Patient portal and communication. Both platforms offer a patient portal, appointment reminders, and secure messaging. Jane's portal is designed around its multi-discipline model — a single portal login works whether the patient is booking a massage or a physiotherapy follow-up. SPRY's portal is built around the outpatient rehab episode of care specifically, surfacing home exercise programs, outcome measure surveys, and billing/payment status in one place tied to the clinical episode rather than a generic appointment history.

Pricing: SPRY vs Jane App

SPRY publishes pricing starting at $79/month, visit-based — the fee scales with actual patient volume rather than a flat per-provider seat charge, and multi-location or enterprise groups receive custom quoting.

Jane uses a tiered, per-practitioner pricing structure with a published starting point around $54/month according to third-party review aggregators — Jane's own current rate card should be confirmed directly on jane.app, since aggregator-sourced pricing data can lag behind a vendor's actual pricing page.

The total-cost comparison that matters more than the sticker price: for a wellness practice with minimal insurance billing, Jane's lower entry price is a real advantage — there's little insurance-claim complexity to solve, so paying less for a horizontal scheduling tool makes sense. For an insurance-heavy outpatient PT/OT/SLP practice, the comparison changes. If Jane's Claim.MD-routed billing produces even a few percentage points more in denials than a rehab-native claim engine, the rework cost — averaging $57.23 per denied claim industry-wide — can outweigh the monthly subscription difference within a single billing cycle. A clinic billing $1M annually with a 5-point clean-claim-rate gap between platforms is looking at roughly $50K in first-pass revenue difference, before rework labor is even counted.

What Users Say: Reviews Compared

‍

One recurring theme in Jane's own review base is worth noting directly: several reviewers specifically mention outgrowing Jane's toolset as patient volume increases — one Capterra reviewer put it as "it just couldn't keep up with us after a certain weekly volume of patients." That pattern lines up with the category gap above: Jane is well-loved by smaller, lower-complexity practices, and less consistently by higher-volume insurance-billing clinics.

Where Jane App Is Better

• Scheduling and online booking UX. This is Jane's strongest, most consistently praised feature across every review source checked for this comparison.
• Multi-discipline flexibility. If a clinic genuinely spans physiotherapy, massage, and counseling under one roof with mostly self-pay or simple-insurance billing, Jane's horizontal design is a legitimate fit.
• Lower entry price for low-complexity practices. For a solo practitioner without heavy Medicare or commercial insurance billing, Jane's starting price is competitive.
• International support. Jane operates natively across the US, Canada, and the UK; SPRY is built specifically for the US market.

Where SPRY Is Better

• Native Medicare and insurance billing automation. The 8-Minute Rule, KX modifier tracking, GP/GO/GN modifier automation, and NCCI edit enforcement are built into the clinical workflow, not handled through a third-party clearinghouse.
• Prior authorization and eligibility verification. Both run automatically inside SPRY; neither is a core Jane feature.
• AI-native documentation. SPRY's AI scribe and auto-suggested CPT/ICD-10 coding are built for rehab-specific documentation; Jane doesn't compete in this category.
• Denial management infrastructure. SPRY includes root-cause denial analytics and a published 24–48-hour resolution benchmark; Jane's general billing tools don't include rehab-specific denial workflows.
• Built to scale with insurance-billing complexity. Where Jane reviewers report the platform straining at higher patient volumes, SPRY's architecture is built around exactly that volume and complexity.

Which One Should Your Practice Choose?

‍

Switching From Jane App to SPRY

Practices moving off Jane App onto SPRY typically do so when insurance billing complexity has outgrown Jane's general-purpose claims routing — most often triggered by a rising denial rate, a growing Medicare caseload, or the addition of a second discipline (adding OT or SLP to an existing PT practice, for example) where discipline-specific modifier automation starts to matter.

SPRY's migration process handles active patient records, scheduling data, and historical A/R, with parallel billing typically run for 2–4 weeks to validate claim output before fully cutting over. Practices that have made a similar EMR/RCM switch to SPRY — including Excel Therapy, OC Sports & Rehab, and Renew Physiotherapy — report measurable gains in clean claim rate and days in A/R post-migration. (Note: these case studies document general EMR migrations to SPRY, not Jane-App-specific switches — no Jane-to-SPRY case study currently exists in SPRY's published materials, so this section should not claim a Jane-specific migration outcome until one is verified.)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is SPRY or Jane App better for physical therapy billing?

For Medicare and commercial insurance billing specifically, SPRY is built for it natively — the 8-Minute Rule, KX modifier tracking, and PT-specific modifiers are automated inside the clinical record. Jane App routes US insurance billing through a third-party Claim.MD integration rather than a native rehab billing engine.

Does Jane App handle Medicare billing for PT clinics?

Jane supports insurance billing generally through its Claim.MD integration, but it does not include PT/OT/SLP-specific automation for the 8-Minute Rule, KX modifier thresholds, or NCCI bundling edits — practices with significant Medicare volume should confirm these are handled correctly before relying on Jane as a primary billing system.

Is Jane App cheaper than SPRY?

Jane's published starting price (around $54/month per third-party sources) is lower than SPRY's $79/month starting price, but SPRY's pricing is visit-based rather than a flat seat fee, and the total cost comparison should include denial-rate differences, not just the subscription line — a lower software cost paired with a higher denial rate can cost more in total for an insurance-heavy practice.

Can Jane App handle multi-discipline PT/OT/SLP billing?

Jane supports scheduling and documentation across multiple disciplines, but it does not apply discipline-specific modifiers (GP, GO, GN) automatically the way SPRY does — multi-discipline rehab clinics should verify modifier handling directly with Jane before assuming parity with a rehab-specialty platform.

Which platform has better reviews?

Both platforms hold strong Capterra ratings (SPRY 4.8/5, Jane approximately 4.8/5 depending on source). SPRY holds a confirmed 4.6/5 on G2; Jane's G2 rating could not be independently confirmed for this comparison and should be verified directly before citing.

Is SPRY or Jane App better for a solo practitioner?

It depends on payer mix. A solo practitioner with mostly self-pay or simple commercial billing may find Jane's lower price and stronger scheduling UX a better fit. A solo PT practice billing Medicare regularly will likely see more value from SPRY's built-in compliance automation, even at a higher starting price.

Does Jane App offer an AI scribe or automated documentation?

Automated AI documentation is not a core part of Jane's published feature set as of this comparison — its documentation tools center on templated forms, charting, and surveys rather than AI-generated notes. SPRY's AI scribe generates SOAP notes in real time and auto-suggests CPT/ICD-10 codes from the documented content, which is a meaningful workflow difference for practices trying to reduce documentation time specifically.

Is Jane App available outside the United States?

Yes — Jane is a Canadian company (headquartered in North Vancouver) and supports clinics in the US, Canada, and the UK, which is a genuine advantage for practices operating outside the US or across borders. SPRY is built specifically for the US healthcare billing and regulatory environment.

What happens to my existing patient and billing data if I switch platforms?

Any credible migration — to SPRY, to Jane, or between any two platforms — should include a structured process for migrating active patient records, historical documentation, and outstanding A/R, along with a parallel-billing period to validate claim output before fully cutting over. Ask any vendor specifically how long their migration takes and what happens to claims still in process on your current platform during the transition.

‍